fix: format notes.py to pass ruff CI check #25

Merged
forgejo_admin merged 1 commit from 23-fix-ruff-format into main 2026-02-25 23:38:31 +00:00

Summary

One-line ruff format fix. CI failed on the slug rename PR (#24) because ruff format wasn't run.

Changes

  • Reformatted HTTPException call in routes/notes.py to fit on one line (ruff preference)

Test Plan

  • ruff format --check . passes
  • ruff check . passes
  • All 14 tests pass

Review Checklist

  • Code follows project conventions
  • Tests pass locally
  • plan-2026-02-25-agent-profiles — Phase 3.5
  • Fixes CI for PR #24 (issue #23)
## Summary One-line ruff format fix. CI failed on the slug rename PR (#24) because `ruff format` wasn't run. ## Changes - Reformatted `HTTPException` call in `routes/notes.py` to fit on one line (ruff preference) ## Test Plan - `ruff format --check .` passes - `ruff check .` passes - All 14 tests pass ## Review Checklist - [x] Code follows project conventions - [x] Tests pass locally ## Related Notes - `plan-2026-02-25-agent-profiles` — Phase 3.5 - Fixes CI for PR #24 (issue #23)
fix: format notes.py to pass ruff check in CI
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful
afc303d306
CI failed on commit 9b86aa1 because ruff format wasn't run
on the slug rename code. This fixes the formatting.

Refs: #23

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
forgejo_admin deleted branch 23-fix-ruff-format 2026-02-25 23:38:31 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.